Censorship: 2011 in Review – California Reader Privacy Upgrade

By Cindy Cohn | Sourced from EFF.org (Creative Commons License) |

As the year draws to a close, EFF is looking back at the major trends influencing digital rights in 2011 and discussing where we are in the fight for a free expression, innovation, fair use, and privacy.

2011 saw a narrow but important upgrade in privacy for Californians, both online and offline. In early October, Governor Brown signed a law that EFF sponsored along with the American Civil Liberties Union that updates reader privacy laws for the digital age, and not a moment too soon.

Digital books now outsell paperbacks on Amazon.com and now represent an over $110 million market, with sales increasing over 1000% in this past year.  Yet digital books allow booksellers and libraries to collect more detailed reader information than ever before, including books browsed but not purchased, books purchased or lent, how long each page is viewed, whether a reader rereads particular pages and even the notes written in the margins.  Major digital booksellers, including Amazon and Google, routinely collect this sort of detailed information about readers. And without strong privacy protections, reading records can be increasingly targeted by government surveillance as well as in legal proceedings like divorce cases and custody battles. While inspired by the digital changes, the bill does not stop with them. It protects reader information at traditional bookstores too.

The new law has two main components: First, it has a heightened standards for accessing personal information associated with books, tracking both the federal 1st Amendment freedom of expression and the fundamental right to privacy under Art. 1 Sec. 1 of the California Constitution. Second, it requires transparency to keep policymakers and the public informed about requests for reading materials from book providers.

The Reader Privacy Act ensures that government and third parties cannot access private reading records without proper justification. It establishes clear rules for businesses and standards for government and third party access to reader records. Most importantly, because of SB 602, Californians can feel comfortable using new digital book services or their corner bookstore without worrying that their personal information will be unprotected.

Our hope is that the Reader Privacy Act can be replicated across the country, and that the Digital Due Process coalition will spread the same sorts of strong protections against government access to reading records beyond books, and beyond California, to include and protect all the reading Americans do online.

Advertisements

Activist, Unplugged from the Matrix. Action for Freedom!

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Censorship, Internet Censorship

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. You have full control over the frequency of emails you receive, and you can unsubscribe at any time. We will NOT share your email address with anyone, ever!

Join 737 other followers

Member of The Internet Defense LeagueBloggers' Rights at EFF
%d bloggers like this: